Tuesday, July 30, 2019
Anthropology sociology Essay
Culture as defined by anthropologist Tylor; ââ¬Å"is that complex whole which includes the knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, customs, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society. â⬠Greenblatt recognizes this definition as vague and more of a gesture towards other more specific cultures such as : ââ¬Å"youth cultureâ⬠or ââ¬Å"human cultureâ⬠. He makes his most definitive statement about culture when defining what it does not refer to- materials. Panegyric and satirical writing are both involved with the ââ¬Å"praise and blameâ⬠of literature. Panegyric takes on the ââ¬Å"praiseâ⬠by positively reinforcing societal structures. Whereas, satire plays the ââ¬Å"blameâ⬠card working towards pointing out the faux pas of society. Cultivation is ââ¬Å"the internalization and practice of a code of mannersâ⬠. ââ¬Å"Exchangeâ⬠is the means in which mobility is achieved. It is the borrowing of plots and adaptations from other literary works; that arenââ¬â¢t necessarily a part of the writers culture. Exchange is the transmission of other cultures. Exchange reaches beyond the social ââ¬Å"constraintsâ⬠of society. Culture is created through this ââ¬Å"praise and blameâ⬠system that takes place both inside the text and also in society. Which works of literature are glorified and held up by a society? And which works of literature are looked down upon by society? Great artists are agents of mobility. Riding this in between zone of ââ¬Å"praise and blameâ⬠ââ¬â they represent the ââ¬Å"andâ⬠the possibility of improvisations amongst a particular society. Literature in this sense is both a byproduct of culture but also literature aids in creating the social restraints of a culture. These two concepts constantly reinforce each other in a circular wayââ¬â making both the mobility and the constraints of culture a possibility. This idea of mobility and constraints also bring to mind the authorââ¬â¢s intention. It seems to me that the author will inherently represent culture in his/her writing because that is what is knownââ¬â that would be the part that wasnââ¬â¢t intended, the constraints of society. However, I think cultural exchange and mobility would have to of been intended by the authorââ¬âthe ideal vision of what they think the world should be like.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.